News Analysis: Some politicians around the world demand the installation of Alternative Energy Sources for Developing Countries such as: Geothermal, Solar, or Wind Power. There some shortcomings in the three: Geothermal Energy is geographically limited to certain areas of the globe [thereby somewhat limiting its cost availability to areas farther from the energy source]. The acquisition of power from the second and third are transient [night skies or unpredictable wind availability].
Coal, does not have the previously mentioned ‘shortcomings’ of the three, and has other attributes. The low cost of coal, itself; its world-wide availability; its transportability; and, its ‘power’ efficiency make it ideal for developing countries. The downside is that it needs to be ‘cleaned ‘ before being utilized. The cost of present day technology to ‘scrub the coal’ will diminish through both scientific advances in “Scrub Processing” as well as due to “Recurring Unit Cost” reductions through increased volume sales by equipment manufacturers.
The positive elements of Coal: Low Cost; Availability; Transportability, and Efficiency make it the ideal energy source for countries the do not have “Money to Burn”.
Investors with foresight into the “Cost/Energy Equation” can benefit from investments in both Coal Cleaning Technologies in particular, and in Coal Resources in general, around the world. Reality.
Reference: http://tinyurl.com/km52m7m