Climate Change Modeling Is Erroneous By “Only” SIXTEEN PER CENT As To Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Absorption By Plants?

News Analysis: ‘Garbage In, Garbage Out’ (GIGO) is alive and well as evidenced by the latest Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Absorption Rates of Flora around the world. Climate Change Modeling is erroneous by “Only” SIXTEEN PER CENT as it concerns this aspect of the Earth’s Environment. Many Scientists would think that number to be evidence of “Blowing It Wholesale” by Computer Modeling ‘Experts’. How would these same Computer Experts like their paychecks short by a ‘mere’ sixteen per cent?

One would be hard pressed to envision another area of Science where the Computer Outputs are ‘so far off the mark’. In Astronomy, Biology, Physics, etc. that percentage would most likely be considered “Egregious Error”. For Climatologists to under play the significance of this blunder says, by offering effete explanations, little for them.

Now the question, many International Businessmen who might be considering investments in Environmental Related Industries is: If the data is so bad, what other incorrect ‘facts’ are being disseminated by the Media? What negative implications might there be for the viability of investments in this area?

While Politicians and other publicity seekers grant interviews about “Global Warming”, which will have the integrity to admit how far off they have been regarding Carbon Dioxide Absorption Rates by Plants?

Reality.

Reference: http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-29601644